Hass im Netz – «Wir stecken mitten in einer Wutwelle»

SRF-Moderator Sandro Brotz ist Opfer von Hatespeech geworden. Ist es richtig, dass er nun vorübergehend den sozialen Medien fernbleibt? Social-Media-Expertin und Bestsellerautorin Ingrid Brodnig über Feindbilder, Fake News und verhärtete Fronten. Frau Brodnig*, wer viel Kritik auf den sozialen Medien einsteckt, zieht sich am besten zurück. Ein guter Plan? Manchmal ist es für den Betroffenen das Einfachste und Eheste, was noch hilft. Weil: Wenn es wirklich solche Kritik hagelt, dann sind das oft hunderte unangenehme Kommentare, die in der Masse den Leuten zu schaffen machen. Natürlich: Das klingt nach einem Ausweichen. Aber wenn ich merke, dass ich damit nicht zurande komme, ist es tatsächlich besser, ich lasse die Finger davon. Wenn Leute merken, dass sie die emotionale Distanz nicht mehr haben, zum Beispiel um eine passende Wortwahl zu finden, ist es besser, wenn sie eine Twitter-Pause machen. Genau so machte es Sandro Brotz. Nach einem umstrittenen und viel kritisierten Tweet verordnete sich «Arena»-Moderator Sandro Brotz selbst eine Twitter-Pause (persoenlich.com berichtete). Also war das richtig?
Wenn mal so eine Wutwelle losgerollt ist, dann gibt es kein Richtig mehr. Es ist dann nicht so, dass es den einen magischen Tweet oder die eine Reaktion gibt, womit die Thematik gegessen und alle wieder friedlich gestimmt wären. Ich glaube, da geht es nur noch um Schadensminimierung. Ein Weg kann sein, dass ich mich zurückhalte und für mich selbst eine Pause suche. Natürlich könnte ein anderer Weg sein, dass man bleibt und versucht, die eigene Sache zu erklären, auch um unterstützende Tweets aufzugreifen. Aber: In dem Moment, wo die Wut schon mal so gross ist, weil ein Thema so polarisiert, dann haben Sie ehrlich gesagt keine wirklich gute Handhabe mehr. Da ist die Zahnpasta schon aus der Tube, da ist die Wut quasi schon übergequollen.
Sprich: Wutwellen entwickeln eine Eigendynamik … Genau. Wenn Sie merken, dass Sie nicht vorankommen, weil es zu viele Reaktionen gibt, können Sie natürlich die Zähne zusammenbeissen und versuchen, weiter Ihren Kurs fortzufahren. Sie können überlegen: Will ich mich vielleicht für etwas entschuldigen und ein bisschen zurückrudern? Aber selbst dann gibt es Fälle, wo eine differenzierte Reaktion auf die eigenen Worte wenig bewirkt, grade wenn es um eine Frontenstellung geht. Und ich muss Ihnen ganz ehrlich sagen, konkret auf den Fall von Sandro Brotz: Da geht es ja nicht um ihn allein. Da geht es um sehr viele andere Themen.

via persoenlicj: Hass im Netz – «Wir stecken mitten in einer Wutwelle»

#Trump von #Facebook verbannt: Plattform löscht Interview mit Ex-Präsident – #kickhimout

Facebook hat ein Interview von Journalistin Lara Trump mit dem ehemaligen US-Präsidenten Donald Trump gelöscht. Auf der Plattform seien keine Beiträge willkommen, in denen Donald Trump spricht. Lara Trump ist die Schwiegertochter von Trump und arbeitet bei Fox News. Schon im Januar hat Facebook die Seite von Donald Trump gesperrt – nachdem er Anhänger ermutigt hatte, sich gegen angeblich falsche Wahlergebnisse zur Wehr zu setzen und einige das Kapitol in Washington gestürmt hatten. Doch offenbar ist das dem Konzern nicht genug: Wie Trumps Schwiegertochter Lara Trump, Mitarbeiterin von Fox News, berichtet, wurde ein von ihr geteiltes Interview mit dem ehemaligen Präsidenten ebenfalls gelöscht. Auf Instagram postete Lara Trump einen Screenshot der angeblichen Nachricht von Facebook – demnach möchte das soziale Netzwerk keine Inhalte auf seinen Seiten haben, in denen Donald Trump spricht. Das erfolge im Zusammenhang mit dem Sperren von Donald Trumps Facebook- und Instagram-Konten. Laut Eric Trump, Sohn von Donald und Ehemann von Lara Trump, gelte für alle in die Trump-Kampagne inkludierten Accounts, dass sie die Stimme des Ex-Präsidenten nicht verbreiten dürften.

via rnd: Trump von Facebook verbannt: Plattform löscht Interview mit Ex-Präsident

https://www.pinterest.de/pin/662592163898496574/

Czech court sentences man who praised deadly #terrorist attack on New Zealand mosques to six years in prison, the longest such sentence yet

News server iDNES.cz has reported that on Tuesday, 16 March the Brno Regional Court in the Czech Republic sentenced a man who praised the 2019 terrorist attack in New Zealand during an online discussion to six years in prison for promoting terrorism. The verdict has yet to take effect and the defendant plans to appeal to the High Court in Olomouc, according to iDNES.cz. The Czech courts have been dealing with many such cases involving people expressing approval online for the attack on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, but before this verdict the defendants had all been given suspended sentences. In March 2019 a right-wing extremist from Australia shot dead more than 50 children, men and women during the attacks. The terrorist broadcast his rampage live online. “That’s giving them a taste of their own medicine. Good job???!” posted Benedikt Čermák online beneath a video recording of the rampage; he has now been sentenced to the six-year prison term. Čermák defended himself by claiming he had not been approving of the crime, but calling on others to reflect on it. “I disagree with what was done. This was my comment on the fact that the shoe was now on the other foot and suddenly there is a different [non-Muslim] psychopath shooting the Muslims dead,” iDNES.cz quoted Čermák as saying. The judge disagreed with Čermák’s claims. “The defendant was not expressing a sense of pity over what happened, just a sense of self-pity. From the wording of his comment it is possible to deduce that he was not criticizing what happened, but praising it,” the judge said when explaining the verdict, according to iDNES.cz. 

via romea.cz: Czech court sentences man who praised deadly terrorist attack on New Zealand mosques to six years in prison, the longest such sentence yet

Bot Lets #Hackers Easily Look Up #Facebook Users’ Phone Numbers – #telegram

The person selling access to the service claims it has data on 500 million Facebook users. A user of a low-level cybercriminal forum is selling access to a database of phone numbers belonging to Facebook users, and conveniently letting customers look up those numbers by using an automated Telegram bot. Although the data is several years old, it still presents a cybersecurity and privacy risk to those whose phone numbers may be exposed—one person advertising the service says it contains data on 500 million users. Facebook told Motherboard the data relates to a vulnerability the company fixed in August 2019. “It is very worrying to see a database of that size being sold in cybercrime communities, it harms our privacy severely and will certainly be used for smishing and other fraudulent activities by bad actors,” Alon Gal, co-founder and CTO of cybersecurity firm Hudson Rock, and who first alerted Motherboard about the bot, said. Do you work at Facebook, or know about another data breach? We’d love to hear from you. Using a non-work phone or computer, you can contact Joseph Cox securely on Signal on +44 20 8133 5190, Wickr on josephcox, OTR chat on jfcox @jabber.ccc.de, or email joseph.cox @vice.com.
Upon launch, the Telegram bot says “The bot helps to find out the cellular phone numbers of Facebook users,” according to Motherboard’s tests. The bot lets users enter either a phone number to receive the corresponding user’s Facebook ID, or visa versa. The initial results from the bot are redacted, but users can buy credits to reveal the full phone number. One credit is $20, with prices stretching up to $5,000 for 10,000 credits. The bot claims to contain information on Facebook users from the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Australia, and 15 other countries. Motherboard tested the bot and confirmed it contained the real phone number of a Facebook user who tries to keep this number private. In 2019, researchers found it was possible to scrape Facebook users’ phone numbers en masse.

via motherboard: Bot Lets Hackers Easily Look Up Facebook Users’ Phone Numbers

Google’s top security teams unilaterally shut down a counterterrorism operation

The decision to block an “expert” level cyberattack has caused controversy inside Google after it emerged that the hackers in question were working for a US ally. Google’s security teams publicly exposed a nine-month hacking operation. What wasn’t disclosed: The move shut down an active counter-terrorist operation being conducted by a Western government. The decision has raised alarms inside Google and elsewhere. Google runs some of the most venerated cybersecurity operations on the planet: its Project Zero team, for example, finds powerful undiscovered security vulnerabilities, while its Threat Analysis Group directly counters hacking backed by governments, including North Korea, China, and Russia. And those two teams caught an unexpectedly big fish recently: an “expert” hacking group exploiting 11 powerful vulnerabilities to compromise devices running iOS, Android, and Windows. But MIT Technology Review has learned that the hackers in question were actually Western government operatives actively conducting a counterterrorism operation. The company’s decision to stop and publicize the attack caused internal division at Google and raised questions inside the intelligence communities of the United States and its allies. (…) In some cases, security companies will clean up so-called “friendly” malware but avoid going public with it. “They typically don’t attribute US-based operations,” says Sasha Romanosky, a former Pentagon official who published recent research into private-sector cybersecurity investigations. “They told us they specifically step away. It’s not their job to figure out; they politely move aside. That’s not unexpected.” While the Google situation is in some ways unusual, there have been somewhat similar cases in the past. The Russian cybersecurity firm Kaspersky came under fire in 2018 when it exposed an American-led counterterrorism cyber operation against ISIS and Al Qaeda members in the Middle East. Kaspersky, like Google, did not explicitly attribute the threat but nevertheless exposed it and rendered it useless, American officials said, which caused the operatives to lose access to a valuable surveillance program and even put the lives of soldiers on the ground at risk. Kaspersky was already under heavy criticism for its relationship with the Russian government at the time, and the company was ultimately banned from US government systems. It has always denied having any special relationship with the Kremlin. Google has found itself in similar water before, too. In 2019, the company released research on what may have been an American hacking group, although specific attribution was never made. But that research was about a historical operation. Google’s recent announcements, however, put the spotlight on what had been a live cyber-espionage operation. 

via tcchnologyreview: Google’s top security teams unilaterally shut down a counterterrorism operation

Amazon Apologizes to Congressman for Bogus ‘Peeing’ Tweet

Amazon is sorry for tweeting about peeing. The company apologized in a late Friday blog post for a tweet it sent to a congressman more than a week ago denying that its employees work so hard they must urinate in empty water bottles. It also admitted that some delivery drivers might have had to urinate in bottles and it vowed to improve their working conditions. The matter was first raised March 24 by Wisconsin U.S. Rep. Mark Pocan, who responded to a tweet by an Amazon executive that said the company was a progressive workplace. “Paying workers $15/hr doesn’t make you a ‘progressive workplace’ when you union-bust & make workers urinate in water bottles,” Pocan said in his tweet. Amazon responded: “You don’t really believe the peeing in bottles thing, do you? If that were true, nobody would work for us.”
In the Friday night blog post, Amazon apologized to Pocan and acknowledged that delivery drivers “can and do have trouble finding restrooms because of traffic or sometimes rural routes.” The online shopping giant said COVID-19 has made the issue worse, since many public restrooms are closed. “Sigh,” Pocan responded in a Saturday morning tweet. “This is not about me, this is about your workers—who you don’t treat with enough respect or dignity.” Amazon wrote in its blog post that urinating in bottles is an industry-wide problem. To try and prove its point, it shared links to news articles about drivers for other delivery companies who have had to do so. “Regardless of the fact that this is industry-wide, we would like to solve it,” the company said. “We don’t yet know how, but will look for solutions.”

via courthousenews: Amazon Apologizes to Congressman for Bogus ‘Peeing’ Tweet

siehe auch_ DOCUMENTS SHOW AMAZON IS AWARE DRIVERS PEE IN BOTTLES AND EVEN DEFECATE EN ROUTE, DESPITE COMPANY DENIAL. If employees actually had to pee in bottles, Amazon said, “nobody would work for us.” That’s a lie. IN ANTICIPATION OF Sen. Bernie Sanders’s scheduled trip to Bessemer, Alabama, to support the unionization drive by Amazon workers there, Amazon executive Dave Clark cast the $1 trillion behemoth as “the Bernie Sanders of employers” and taunted: “So if you want to hear about $15 an hour and health care, Senator Sanders will be speaking downtown. But if you would like to make at least $15 an hour and have good health care, Amazon is hiring.” Rep. Mark Pocan replied via tweet: “Paying workers $15/hr doesn’t make you a progressive workplace when you union-bust & make workers urinate in water bottles,” echoing reports from 2018 that Amazon workers were forced to skip bathroom breaks and pee in bottles. Amazon’s denial was swift: “You don’t really believe the peeing in bottles thing, do you? If that were true, nobody would work for us.”

Neo-Nazis plan to ‘breed out Jewish race’ by seducing ‘sexy Jewesses’

“Run so many trains on a Jewb***h, her nickname will be Auschwitz.”. An Australian Neo-Nazi group used social media platform Gab to call on members to “seduce sexy Melbourne Jewesses” and “breed out the Jewish race with Alpha Aryan Australian POWER,” according to the Anti-Defamation Commission (ADC). The leader of the group, the National Socialist Network (NSN), also posted a photo of the ADC’s Chairman Dvir Abramovich inside a gas chamber, according to the ADC. Additionally, the post set as a “side quest” to seduce Australian Senator Kristina Keneally stating that “she can’t proscribe us if we are breeding her.”
The NSN post states that the organization wants “every honorable white man, national socialist, Klansman, skinhead, racist, out on the town for Operation Ashkenazi Strange.” It shows three men, with their faces covered, holding a whiteboard with instructions telling followers to go clubbing in Jewish areas and seduce Jewish women to “breed” with.

via jpost: Neo-Nazis plan to ‘breed out Jewish race’ by seducing ‘sexy Jewesses’