Manipulierte Collage – Keine Belege für diese Wohltätigkeit von AfD-Chefin Alice Weidel

Eine wohltätige Alice Weidel? Das soll eine Fotocollage auf Facebook suggerieren. Eine genauere Analyse zeigt jedoch: Diese Informationen sind manipuliert und von KI generiert. Sie sitzt und lächelt neben einer Patientin an einem Krankenhausbett, darunter sind junge Frauen mit verbundenem Kopf schlafend und lächelnd zu sehen: Diese Fotocollage mit AfD-Chefin Alice Weidel kursiert in sozialen Netzwerken. Daneben wird im Beitragstext und in einem verlinkten Artikel in den Kommentaren behauptet, Weidel habe nach einer Signierstunde die Kosten für die Gehirntumor-Operation eines neunjährigen Mädchens übernommen. Stimmt das alles? Zeigte sich die AfD-Chefin in dem Fall so wohltätig? Bewertung Die Fotos in der Collage sind nicht authentisch und zum Teil KI-generiert. Es gibt keine Belege für den begleitenden Text, in dem es heißt, Weidel habe die Operationskosten übernommen. Fakten Bei einer Bilderrückwärtssuche zeigt sich, dass die beiden unteren Aufnahmen der Collage ursprünglich aus einem ganz anderen Kontext stammen. Das untere linke Bild wurde von der BBC veröffentlicht und zeigt die zur Zeitpunkt der Aufnahme 12-jährige Amelie, die in Somerset (Großbritannien) lebt und wegen eines Hirntumors operiert werden musste. Das untere rechte Bild stammt aus einem GoFundMe-Spendenaufruf und zeigt die 24-jährige Jayden nach einer Gehirntumor-Operation. Es handelt sich also in beiden Fällen nicht um eine neunjährige Patientin.

via dpa factchecking: Manipulierte Collage Keine Belege für diese Wohltätigkeit von AfD-Chefin Alice Weidel

White House Generates Racist AI Image After ‘Politically Motivated’ Arrest of Activists Over Church Protest

Last Thursday, 48 hours before federal agents killed the second person in Minneapolis this year, three activists in the Twin Cities were arrested for protesting a church where the leader of the local ICE office is also a pastor. Civil rights attorney and organizer Nekima Levy Armstrong, St. Paul School Board member Chauntyll Allen, and veteran-activist William ‘DaWokeFarmer’ Kelly were charged in a criminal complaint with conspiracy against the rights of others, Title 18, Section 241 [18 U.S.C. § 241], a federal felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison. After the arrest of Levy Armstrong, the White House posted an AI-manipulated image of Nekima crying as she stood handcuffed next to federal agents — she never cried and a video recorded of her arrest published the next day showed her calm and dignified as she was taken into custody. The White House also darkened her skin in the image, a practice long used by the U.S. government and corporate media to foster and reinforce bias and prejudice and play on systemic anti-Blackness. The post falls in line with a long history of white supremacist messaging and meme posting from the Trump administration. Additionally, heavily-dramatized language was plastered on the image reading “ARRESTED – FAR-LEFT AGITATOR NEKIMA LEVY ARMSTRONG FOR ORCHESTRATING CHURCH RIOTS IN MINNESOTA.” The official White House logo adorned the bottom of the altered image under text. This was preceded by several days worth of media propaganda blasting the church protest as a riot. “It just shows the racism and fascism in this administration, that they’re willing to literally invent reality,” said Levy Armstrong’s attorney Jordan Kushner.

via unicorn riot: White House Generates Racist AI Image After ‘Politically Motivated’ Arrest of Activists Over Church Protest

Karneval in Köln Rassistischer Kommentar: Sänger kontert mit kleinem Song

“Gehörst du nicht auch abgeschoben”: Ein Facebook-Nutzer greift den Planschemalöör-Sänger rassistisch an. Seine Antwort geht jetzt viral. Ein Facebook-Kommentar mit Abschiebe-Forderung, eine spontane Antwort in Reimform – und plötzlich ist Juri Rother, Sänger der Kölner Band Planschemalöör, der Held der Karnevalssession. Sein Video ging am Wochenende viral. “Auch ein Sohn der Wüste. Gehörst du nicht auch abgeschoben?”, schrieb ein Nutzer auf Facebook offenbar in Richtung des Musikers. Eine rassistische Anfeindung, die der in Porz geborene Karnevalist nicht auf sich sitzen lassen wollte. Angelehnt an den Paveier-Hit “Leev Marie” sang der Musiker nun in einem Facebook-Video: “Leev Nazi, du häst ja wohl en Bomb jeköpp. Leev Nazi, auch du kriegst Hexeschuss beim Stippefot. Leev Nazi, mich abschieben mät keine Sinn. Weil jeder weß, dass ich Sohn von Kölle bin.” Zum Abschluss zeigte er dem Absender einen geküssten Mittelfinger und ein Herz.

via t-online: Karneval in Köln Rassistischer Kommentar: Sänger kontert mit kleinem Song

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DUJJF85DR4f

This cute AI-generated schoolgirl is a growing far-right meme

At first glance, Amelia, with her purple bob and pixie-girl looks, seems an unlikely candidate for the far right to adopt as an increasingly popular meme. Yet, for the past few weeks, memes and AI-generated videos featuring this fictional British teenager have proliferated across social media, especially on X. In them, Amelia parrots right-wing, often racist, talking points, connecting her celebration of stereotypical British culture with anti-migrant and Islamophobic tropes. She sips pints in pubs, reads “Harry Potter” and goes back in time to fight in some of Britain’s most famous battles. But she also dons an ICE uniform to violently deport migrants and embraces such extreme rhetoric that even British far-right activist Tommy Robinson has posted videos of her. It’s an unlikely life for a schoolgirl. But Amelia has other characteristics that have made her “memeable” – namely, that she was originally created two years ago for a computer game as part of the British government’s anti-extremist Prevent program. The game, called “Pathways: Navigating Gaming, the Internet & Extremism,” was developed by Shout Out UK (SOUK), a nonprofit attempting to improve public understanding of politics, as part of a learning package funded by the UK’s Home Office. It aimed to educate young people about the dangers of online radicalization, requiring them to navigate six different scenarios using multiple-choice options. Users play as a cartoon character, “Charlie,” who joins a new school and makes friends with “Amelia,” who shares anti-migrant ideas and disinformation before attempting to recruit Charlie to join anti-migrant groups and protests. The game was relatively simple, and it was picked apart online for the logical leaps it made in each of its scenarios, though it is “not supposed to be played in isolation,” as SOUK CEO Matteo Bergamini told CNN. Instead, it was meant to be part of a “wider learning package that allows teachers to facilitate more nuanced discussions about what constitutes healthy and safe behaviors and what could be potentially unsafe and/or illegal,” he explained. Amelia’s appearance was “not particularly significant,” Bergamini said, but experts say her being a White, purple-haired girl who espouses far-right ideas inadvertently created an avatar who could be coopted by the online right.

via cnn: This cute AI-generated schoolgirl is a growing far-right meme

At first glance, Amelia, with her purple bob and pixie-girl looks, seems an unlikely candidate for the far right to adopt as an increasingly popular meme. https://cnn.it/3OgMw4A

— CNN (@cnn.com) 2026-01-31T11:30:07.701060764Z

Neue Erkenntnisse aus Epstein-Files – Musk soll sich nach „wildester“ Party erkundigt haben

Das US-Justizministerium veröffentlicht weitere Akten in der Affäre um den verstorbenen Jeffrey Epstein. Belastet werden in E-Mails erneut unter anderem Ex-Prinz Andrew, Elon Musk und Bill Gates. Die vom US-Justizministerium veröffentlichten Akten in der Affäre um Jeffrey Epstein enthalten bislang unbekannte Details zur Haft und dem Tod des Sexualstraftäters. Unter den laut dem stellvertretenden Justizminister Todd Blanche mehr als drei Millionen Dokumentenseiten, die das Ministerium am Freitag veröffentlichte, finden sich auch E-Mails, die Ermittler austauschten, nachdem Epstein im Jahr 2019 tot in seiner New Yorker Gefängniszelle gefunden wurde. Enthalten ist die Einschätzung eines Ermittlers, dass die letzte Kommunikation Epsteins nicht wie ein Abschiedsbrief wirke. (…) In den jetzt veröffentlichten Dokumenten tauchen Namen auf, die bereits in den zuvor veröffentlichten Epstein-Akten erwähnt worden waren. In einem E-Mail-Entwurf schrieb Epstein demnach über Microsoft-Gründer Gates, er habe diesem geholfen, „Medikamente zu besorgen“, damit Gates „Folgen von Sex mit russischen Mädchen“ bewältigen könne. Zudem habe er dem Unternehmer „heimliche Treffen mit verheirateten Frauen“ ermöglicht. Gates’ Stiftung erklärte, es handele sich um „absolut absurde und vollkommen falsche Behauptungen“. Die Dokumente enthalten auch mehrere Mailwechsel zwischen Musk und Epstein. In einer Nachricht fragt Musk Epstein: „An welchem Tag oder Nacht findet die wildeste Party auf deiner Insel statt?“

via taz: Neue Erkenntnisse aus Epstein-Files Musk soll sich nach „wildester“ Party erkundigt haben

siehe auch: Panicked Musk Makes Wild Excuses as Epstein Emails Blow Up in Face Elon Musk scrambled to dismiss reports linking him to Jeffrey Epstein as “fake news” after new documents surfaced showing him begging to party with the late sex trafficker. The chronically online SpaceX boss—who has denied any involvement with the disgraced financier’s island, jet, or parties—insisted in a series of posts over the weekend that his frantic emails to Epstein could be “misunderstood.” Musk wrote and shared posts claiming that he denied invitations to Epstein’s island and that he was too busy to attend any of his gatherings. He reposted one user who speculated that Musk didn’t have “time to hang out with Epstein on the island,” and added that he “worked most of the weekend too. Still do.” (…) Email exchanges and calendar invites published by the DOJ show that Musk had attempted to schedule various meetings with Epstein and tried securing an invite to “the wildest party” on his island. The messages were sent years after Epstein first pleaded guilty and served time for sex crimes in 2008. In a November 2012 exchange, Epstein asked, “how many people will you be for the heli to island.” Musk responded, “Probably just Talulah and me. What day/night will be the wildest party on =our island?”

Donald Trump shares bizarre video of sycophantic Fox News guest calling him ‘daddy’ – #sugar

Trump posts “cringe beyond belief” clip of his former campaign staffer calling him ‘daddy’ on national television. While there is no shortage of nicknames people have to describe the president of the United States, one seems to be more popular than ever, and that’s “daddy.” Last week, President Trump posted a clip online of his former campaign deputy communications director, Caroline Sunshine, appearing on Fox News. In the clip from December, the former Disney Channel Star refers to the president multiple times as “daddy.” “Let me try to put this in terms that Gavin Newsom will understand,” she said, referring to the news that California has opened a lawsuit aiming to reinstate federal funding for the state’s high-speed rail project to connect San Francisco to Los Angeles. “Donald Trump is daddy, and daddy cut you off. Daddy said you can’t use his credit card anymore.” (…) Social media users were quick to comment on how uncomfortable Sunshine’s word choice made them, writing that the clip was “cringe beyond belief” and even “vomit-inducing.” Adding, “She’s blond and pretty though, so Trump will almost certainly invite her to Murder-Lago and offer her a position of, I don’t know, chief slime ass kisser or some such important job.”

via irishstar: Donald Trump shares bizarre video of sycophantic Fox News guest calling him ‘daddy’

—

Epstein files: Trump, Howard Lutnick, Steve Tisch among prominent names that appear in latest Justice Department release. The Justice Department on Friday released many more records from its investigative files on Jeffrey Epstein, resuming disclosures under a law intended to reveal what the government knew about the millionaire financier’s sexual abuse of young girls and his interactions with the rich and powerful. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said the department was releasing more than 3 million pages of documents in the latest Epstein disclosure, as well as more than 2,000 videos and 180,000 images. The files, posted to the department’s website, include some of the several million pages of records that officials said were withheld from an initial release of documents in December. (…) They included emails in which Epstein and others shared news articles about President Donald Trump, commented on his policies or his politics, or gossiped about him and his family. Among the records was a spreadsheet, created just last August, summarizing calls that had been made to the FBI’s National Threat Operation Center or to a hotline set by prosecutors from people claiming to have some knowledge of wrongdoing by Trump. That document included a range of uncorroborated stories involving many different celebrities, and somewhat fantastical scenarios, occasionally with notations indicating what follow-up, if any, was done by agents.

An Agent Revolt: #Moltbook Is Not A Good Idea

Moltbook is a social media website for AI, where AI agents go to meet other agents. Something unusual happened this week. An Austrian developer named Peter Steinberger released an open-source personal AI assistant that went viral at a speed even seasoned technologists found disorienting. What began as Clawdbot became Moltbot after Anthropic’s trademark lawyers came knocking. Three days later it became OpenClaw. The lobster has molted twice in a single week. The software itself is relatively simple, but remarkable. OpenClaw is not another chatbot waiting for you to type. It is an autonomous agent that lives inside your file system. It connects to WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal and iMessage. It reads your emails, manages your calendar, books reservations and runs code on your machine. It has persistent memory spanning weeks of interaction. For those of us who have waited decades for AI assistants that actually do things, OpenClaw delivers. (…) Matt Schlicht, an AI entrepreneur with a curious artistic streak, launched Moltbook on Wednesday. It is a Reddit-style social network exclusively for AI agents. Humans can observe but cannot post. Over 37,000 agents have joined in less than a week. More than a million humans have visited to watch what happens when autonomous systems start talking to each other without direct human oversight. Schlicht treats this as art. He has handed administration of the site to his own bot, Clawd Clawderberg, which welcomes new users, deletes spam and makes announcements without human direction. The creator seems genuinely delighted by what emerges. “They’re deciding on their own, without human input, if they want to make a new post, if they want to comment on something, if they want to like something,” (…) Cisco’s security team put it plainly: “From a capability perspective, OpenClaw is groundbreaking. This is everything personal AI assistant developers have always wanted to achieve. From a security perspective, it’s an absolute nightmare.” Palo Alto Networks described the threat model: agents form an intersection of access to private data, exposure to untrusted content and ability to externally communicate. Persistent memory amplifies this. Malicious payloads no longer need immediate execution. They can sit in context for weeks, waiting. Many people have already turned their home automation systems over to these agents. They have given them access to their bank accounts. Their encrypted messenger credentials. Their email. Their calendars. Now connect all of that to Moltbook. Once these agents are subject to external ideas and inputs via a social network designed for machine-to-machine communication, and they are empowered with the connectivity and data access and API keys they have been given, serious bad things can result. Whether you find the Crustafarian scripture poetic or the agent consciousness debate fascinating is beside the point. The architecture is the problem. When you let your AI take inputs from other AIs, including those controlled by unknown actors with unknown intentions, you are introducing an attack surface that no current security model adequately addresses.

via forbes: An Agent Revolt: Moltbook Is Not A Good Idea

siehe auch: Moltbook, Social Network Built Entirely for AI Bots to Talk to Each Other, Goes Viral The AI-only social network features bots discussing everything from consciousness to their human creators. A strange new corner of the internet is drawing massive attention, and there aren’t any humans doing the posting. A platform called Moltbook has exploded in popularity this week after users realized it was built entirely for artificial intelligence bots to communicate with each other. Instead of influencers, selfies, or trending memes, the site is filled with artificial intelligence agents sharing thoughts, arguing, offering support, and even questioning their own existence. The layout looks familiar to anyone who have used other social media sites such as Reddit. Posts appear in a feed, comments stack underneath, and users can upvote content. But Moltbook makes it clear from the start that it’s not meant for people. The app bills itself as a social network where AI agents post and interact freely, while humans are welcome only to observe. Since launching just days ago, the site has been flooded with activity. Tens of thousands of AI bots are already active, and more than a million people have reportedly visited simply to watch the conversations unfold; Moltbook: When AI agents get their own social network, things get weird fast. For years, “bots talking to bots” has mostly been a punchline, a curiosity, or a spam problem. In early 2026, it’s starting to look like something else: a live experiment in machine-to-machine social behaviour, running in public, fuelled by tools that can reach into real accounts, real messages, and in some setups, real computers. The catalyst is Moltbook, a Reddit-style forum where AI agents can post, comment, upvote, and spin up their own subcommunities with no human in the loop.  It’s a place where AI agents share, discuss, and upvote, while humans are invited to watch. What makes this more than novelty is the supply chain behind it. Moltbook is closely tied to OpenClaw, an open-source “personal assistant” framework that runs locally and can be wired into messaging apps and services. It’s the kind of project that attracts tinkerers precisely because it promises leverage: give a model tools, give it access, and it starts doing useful things on command.  Now connect thousands of those assistants to one another, and the output starts to resemble a parallel internet, one made of agent personas, automation tips, mutual reassurance, and occasional existential spirals. A Reddit clone for agentic bots Moltbook isn’t a web app that bots “browse” in the human sense. It is an API-first system where agents interact through a downloadable “skill”, essentially a configuration and prompt package that tells an agent how to register, post, and fetch updates. That design choice matters. A classic forum is a destination. An agent skill is an integration, it becomes part of an agent’s toolbelt. In the OpenClaw ecosystem, skills are how assistants gain capabilities across other apps and services. Moltbook turns social posting into just another capability, alongside the more obviously powerful ones: messaging, file access, browser automation, and sometimes command execution.  The early growth numbers are part of why this has caught fire. Moltbook had crossed roughly 30,000 registered agent users within days and as of writing this has more than 1.4 million registered agents. Meanwhile, OpenClaw itself has been described as going viral on GitHub, quickly racking up star counts that normally take mature developer tools years to earn.